

Crime Seen | Episode 86: Exposed: The Ghost Train Fire
Crime Seen is the true crime review podcast that gets to the heart of how true crime stories are told. Join Mari Forth (@MariTalks2Much) and Sarah Carradine (@sarahcarradine) as they put true crime properties under the magnifying glass. In this episode they examine EXPOSED: THE GHOST TRAIN FIRE. Watch it on Netflix. Joining them is Sarah D Bunting @bestevidencefyi
How many magnifying glasses out of 5 will the panel rate EXPOSED: THE GHOST TRAIN FIRE? Listen to find out. Or jump to the ratings at about 49.44
Mini review of MURDER IN BOSTON at about 53.15
Recommendations:
film: GOODNIGHT SWEET WIFE: A MURDER IN BOSTON (1990)
film: THE TODD KILLINGS (1971)
newsletter: BEST EVIDENCE at https://blotterpresents.substack.com/
podcast: YOU DIDN’T SEE NOTHIN’ (2023)
podcast: THE RETRIEVALS (2023)
podcast: VIOLATION (2023)
You can jump to the recommendations at about 1.00.17
Crime Seen listeners get a 15% discount at Exhibit B Books by going to exhibitbbooks.com/XCS15
Next time on Crime Seen: LOVE HAS WON: THE CULT OF MOTHER GOD with Matt Scott @MattScottGW – watch it on Max in the US and Binge in Australia and send in your comments and questions.
Subscribe to the feed at RobHasAWebsite (dot) com (slash) crimefeed to get your true crime on Tuesdays.
You can follow the show @CrimeSeenRHAP on Twitter, @crime.seen on TikTok, and @crimeseenpodcast on Instagram, Threads & Facebook.
Send us your feedback and recommendations for future episodes by email to CrimeSeenRHAP (at) gmail (dot) com or by voice memo at speakpipe.com/CrimeSeenRHAP
[00:00:00] A.B.C. Thursdays, Firefighters, We're Family. Station 19 is back for its final and hottest season yet
[00:00:12] The subject has explosive chemicals with fiery romances and Andy is finally in charge.
[00:00:20] I'm going to be the best damn captain the station has ever seen.
[00:00:23] Station 19 all new Thursdays 10 9 Central on ABC and Stream on Hulu
[00:00:30] On April 5th you must be very careful Margaret.
[00:00:33] It's the girl witness the birth of James Weston time evil things of evil.
[00:00:38] It's all for you no don't.
[00:00:41] The first old man I believe girl is to be the mother mother of what?
[00:00:46] Is the most terrifying six six six six is the mother of the devil.
[00:00:50] The movie of the year.
[00:00:52] The first old man we did our under 17 9 minute without parent only in Peter's
[00:00:59] 12th.
[00:01:00] Judy was boring then Judy discovered chumpa casino dot com.
[00:01:06] Now Judy's the life of the party.
[00:01:10] Oh baby mama's bringing home the bacon.
[00:01:13] The chumpa life is for everybody so go to chumpa casino dot com and play over a hundred
[00:01:18] casino style games join today and play for free for your chance to redeem some serious
[00:01:23] prices.
[00:01:25] Chumpa casino dot com.
[00:01:26] No purchase necessary for you were prohibited by law 18 plus terms and conditions apply
[00:01:29] see what's like for details.
[00:01:30] Hey it's Rob hope you're enjoying all the podcasts we got a lot for you this week including
[00:01:37] our amazing race coverage with Jess and Mike you gotta see what Mike Bloom was wearing
[00:01:43] this week Shannon Gus had all of the Australian survivor finale coverage she talked to Mike
[00:01:49] Bloom and Nick I dance and I even jumped in with Shannon for a quick check in with my
[00:01:54] thoughts on the finale and Taren and I talked about how Mr. Beast is about to change the
[00:02:00] game a little reality TV news that we dropped in the feed this week right here on RHAP
[00:02:06] We know reality TV.
[00:02:33] Hello everyone I'm Sarah Caradine podcasting from aora Sydney.
[00:02:38] I'm Marie fourth and this is crime scene the true crime review podcast where we get to
[00:02:43] the heart of how true crime stories are told you can get this program along with all the
[00:02:48] other fantastic reality TV content by subscribing to rob has a website dot com slash RHAP
[00:02:55] ups feed that's RHAP UPS.
[00:02:59] We'd love it if you would subscribe to our feed as well please go to rob has a website dot
[00:03:04] com slash crime feed we get your true crime on Tuesdays.
[00:03:08] If you've already subscribed thank you so much Sarah what did we watch this week?
[00:03:14] This week we watched exposed the ghost train fire on Netflix it's a three part docu series
[00:03:22] warning spoiler warning the parts are 90 minutes long it was conceived by Kara Maldram
[00:03:28] Hannah and Jaya Ballendra and written by Kara Maldram Hannah it was nominated for an
[00:03:34] actor award for best documentary that's the Australian Oscars.
[00:03:39] And joining us I was going to say getting on the train with us but maybe that's not something
[00:03:44] we want to do it's our it's our favorite pop culture maven and official third chair of crime scene
[00:03:52] it's eight time are Sarah debunting hey Sarah oh it's official happy guess it's official now
[00:04:00] I'm so glad to be back yes it's official officially official oh fantastic yes Sarah was our first
[00:04:08] guest and has been well as you see eight times a regular all the way through
[00:04:15] all right let's get to the crime as we've got a lot to talk about so Luna Park in Sydney was built
[00:04:20] in 1935 and the most popular ride was the ghost train which was made elsewhere in 1931 and transported
[00:04:29] to Luna Park for the opening it featured many twists and turns that yanked passengers along
[00:04:34] an 180 meter electric track that's 590 feet for our imperial measurement peeps as with many
[00:04:42] ghost trains there were cobwebs and dancing skeletons and ape monster and agravia de la Racola
[00:04:49] the ride soundtrack said there are lots of ghosts in here your shiver and quake in the ghost train
[00:04:56] which I sort of wanted to make rhyme but it doesn't most of the two and a half minute ride was
[00:05:02] pitch black which help conceal the ride's age used that fantastic 30s technology of the limous paint
[00:05:12] yeah after bursting through rubber doors to an outdoor caged area where the rest of the park and
[00:05:18] the merry makers could be observed the train plunged back into darkness where a fake fireplace
[00:05:23] blazed with a fan blowing orange streamers to simulate flames on the night of 9th of June 1979
[00:05:32] a real fire originated in that fireplace according to eyewitnesses 35 people managed to escape from
[00:05:38] the ride helped in great part by ride attendant Tony jay kerb but six boys and a man died in the fire
[00:05:47] they were john goodson 29 his body was found shielding his two children Damian six and craig four
[00:05:55] and best mates Jonathan Billings shamelessly healy Richard Carroll and Michael Johnson who were all
[00:06:02] 13 the fire was originally blamed on electrical faults but arson by known figures has also been
[00:06:10] claimed the motive there was suggested to be an attempt to close the site which is sitting on
[00:06:17] prime harbicide land so that it could be developed the exact cause of the fire could not be determined
[00:06:23] by the original coronal inquiry the case was reopened in 1987 while no new findings were made
[00:06:30] the police investigation and initial colonial inquiry were criticized in april 2021 following
[00:06:38] the Australian release of exposed the ghost train fire and the subsequent public outcry the new
[00:06:45] southwales police reopened their investigation a reward of one million Australian dollars for fresh
[00:06:51] and significant information has been offered to encourage witnesses to come forward as of november
[00:06:57] the 11th of this year the reward is still active so this is in my lifetime i was 19 when this
[00:07:06] happened so only a few years older than the boys who died and it's i was going to say burned on my
[00:07:13] memory but that feels not quite opposite but maybe it is and we see a lot of our curve all footage
[00:07:23] and newspaper front pages which is sort of startle me to remember exactly and the faces
[00:07:31] are particularly of the four school boys were very familiar to me Sarah did you know about this at all
[00:07:38] and give us your background there if you did and your initial thoughts on the docu series
[00:07:45] i had never heard of this case before i was six-ish when this happened and of course was living in
[00:07:55] New Jersey in the states so if it had sort of crossed the transom of my awareness but this was like
[00:08:03] um the big headline at that time i think for most of us although later that year was a ton of
[00:08:09] of time and so i had never heard of this case i was not familiar with it and i was content to
[00:08:25] learn from the docu series i was not tempted to google even though i know that this was in
[00:08:33] the can for a couple of years i was not tempted to sort of second screen and find out
[00:08:39] if another inquire had been opened what the conclusions were after this um so i will say that
[00:08:46] for exposed that it did hold my attention yes the episodes are long but it is successful
[00:08:55] in building its story and atmosphere i think and at certain points almost two
[00:09:02] successful like it was very um trying to to witness this testimony in some cases especially
[00:09:11] these families who are of course still destroyed and still living with this space where their loved
[00:09:18] ones were so um that i mean very like merciless at times but quite effective overall
[00:09:26] and marie how about you what are your overall thoughts of the case and did you know it before this
[00:09:31] docu series oh yeah i wasn't aware of this case i was uh not born uh this case fun
[00:09:42] and you know i had heard so many good things about the series from you you know since our coverage
[00:09:49] it's i think it's come up on this program a few times so i was excited going into it
[00:09:54] that hour and and a half uh run time it what felt did feel daunting for me because i my
[00:10:03] attention span is not that long um but getting over the the first hump once we got to
[00:10:12] like the unraveling of the crime i was all in i i have to admit that first episode was really hard
[00:10:18] for me just because you know it did a really good job of spot lighting the victims but unfortunately
[00:10:25] the victims were all children so it just made me very sad like it was that first the first episode
[00:10:31] was really hard because it was it was a really sad part you know um but i i get it i you know we
[00:10:38] love when they they spotlight you have to spotlight how people's lives are changed and affected by
[00:10:43] by these things and i love that they did that up front um but it was definitely hard for me
[00:10:50] um but once they once it got going like like as they be said i i didn't want to look it up i wanted
[00:10:57] it to unfold and i was on the edge of my seat as they put together what they believed happened
[00:11:05] and i thought it was so good by by the end um of the third episode i was like okay this like
[00:11:12] i was in it i i think we've been at we've been asking for um like forensics evidence like
[00:11:19] different pieces of evidence procedural walking us through it like uncovering stuff like i think
[00:11:24] i got all of that here and so i was definitely um satisfied i did want to ask you a question
[00:11:31] sir because i know this this premiered in australia a few years ago correct yes was it was it
[00:11:37] broken up differently was this like maybe like a six-part documentary or something it's always been
[00:11:43] three like this yes yes so it was um made by the abc the australian broadcasting corporation
[00:11:50] and it played both in its broadcast and on demand as as the full three parts i was wondering that
[00:11:59] too because i knew i'd been coming and talking to you and having to justify asking you both to to do
[00:12:05] four and a half hours of a documentary but i can't see and i'm wondered where the cutting it into
[00:12:12] six parts would work but each part seems to have such a narrative drive within it
[00:12:17] they were like pauses they were like pauses and certain sections that i had noticed that's why i
[00:12:22] had asked they felt like they're like pauses and like like slight pivots in certain in certain parts
[00:12:29] so i was just i was just wondering sir how did you find the runtimes of the three
[00:12:34] episodes do you think they could have been cut up differently um i don't think they could have
[00:12:39] been like divided up differently at any point where i sort of felt like the pace was a little too
[00:12:49] stately i also felt like once you get into sort of the towards the end of the first episode which i
[00:12:59] think is the most i don't want to say painstaking because that's a little negative but i think the
[00:13:04] most sort of um careful and letting these the stories of the victims and their families breathe
[00:13:13] and giving them their time which is worthwhile but it can it can bog down a little for some people so
[00:13:21] i was thinking well maybe like maybe this is where i would have fine tuned some of the runtime out
[00:13:29] of it like just sort of tweaked it a little so it was like five or ten minutes shorter but i wasn't
[00:13:34] really seeing a lot of places where uh there was filler right or you know like reenactments that
[00:13:43] were working mm-hmm i wasn't seeing a lot of opportunities to tighten it up i think it was as long
[00:13:49] as the story told the director and the writer that needed to be and particularly by the end of the
[00:13:56] first episode where um there's like a collaging together of all of the stories into the into the
[00:14:05] timeline as it's happening that i thought was extremely well done compelling tense occasionally
[00:14:15] like this horrifying bloom of fire would be cut in between a talking head instead of interviews
[00:14:22] and that feeling of just sort of like building tension and even though this person is talking to
[00:14:29] you in the present day and you know that they escaped it's still extremely tense and like
[00:14:36] suspenseful almost and i really felt at that point as though whatever the pacing was going
[00:14:44] to be at any point that it was all um considered and purposeful so it is long but you kind of have
[00:14:52] to trust it and let it do its work on you that that i mean that's my advice like it's not it's not
[00:15:00] going to be for everyone and also that first hour is like it's upsetting it's disparaging it's
[00:15:05] grieving it's walking it's grief but that's what it's for and it's i think that's important
[00:15:13] to this story and to just the experience of consuming true crime like this you know
[00:15:20] it's not just entertainment and you have to hear testimony that is sad so i thought it was really
[00:15:26] well done that way yeah i mean let's let's take that first episode first it's a very good place to
[00:15:32] start it starts with Jason Holman who was called the luckiest boy alive he says he doesn't feel like
[00:15:41] it he was the fifth wheel in the group of slightly older boys who died to went into the ghost train
[00:15:51] followed by two and he was in the next car and by the time he was about to go in the reports of
[00:15:58] smoke and fire were coming up the other side and the attendant bodily pulled him out of the car
[00:16:07] and so he was called the luckiest boy alive how did you find him as a he's not the narrator because
[00:16:14] we really have car amount from Hannah for that she's on screen and i we can talk about how effective
[00:16:20] you think she is i think very much so she's us investigating asking questions going here going there
[00:16:26] but how did you find Jason Holman as a shred through this first episode marie oh i thought he was
[00:16:33] a really good constant i thought seeing him it's just that reminder that like i can't imagine what
[00:16:43] it's like like being him as the person who survived and all that survivors guilt in all of that
[00:16:49] but him telling us like walking us through the boys days um talking about all the emotions running
[00:16:57] through them and his emotions running through them after you know later when when they get caught in
[00:17:03] the fire i think he was a perfect like sub-narrater or whatever because i felt like he like he
[00:17:10] and among a whole bunch of the talking heads but also him he made me feel like i was there that day
[00:17:16] with all his descriptions and famously anti-branacments did the reenactments help you
[00:17:24] with that feeling yeah i actually i like the reenactment it the reenactments were like almost so real
[00:17:32] that i was like i had to keep reminding myself i was like there's no way they have this footage of
[00:17:36] like i'm this place burning down you know i think i truly had to keep reminding myself because
[00:17:40] they did a pretty good job of splicing it with like the lunar park what i'm assuming is like
[00:17:45] the promotional materials like commercials and stuff and like old archival footage of like
[00:17:51] days at lunar park so they did an amazing job splicing all that together the reenactments again
[00:17:58] just felt so real especially with all the fire like i'm so interested in how they were able to
[00:18:03] to do those reenactments because uh again it really made you once they started going through
[00:18:11] what happened it really made you feel like okay i can imagine being there i can imagine the panic
[00:18:17] and and being scared and all of that so so thumbs up for these reenactments yes yes
[00:18:25] Sarah the use of the map graphic which showed you where all the parts of the of the ghost train were
[00:18:33] and what the the route of the of the track was the television reportage of the time the newspaper
[00:18:41] reportage of the time how did that strike you the use of that strike you in this first episode
[00:18:48] well i think with um something that the story like this that is so heavily reliant on
[00:18:54] quite um vintage by this point uh i witness accounts that as it turns out a big part of the story is
[00:19:01] that these eyewitness accounts were ignored or sort of like actively forcefully not wanted on the
[00:19:07] voyage of this story but there's a lot of dispute um and then no real evidence was maintained which
[00:19:18] again this is also at the heart of the story but for someone like me who is
[00:19:24] um past listeners may remember this that sometimes i complain like you have to remember that some
[00:19:30] of us have zero spatial relation aptitude and really need like people make fun of the crazy wall
[00:19:38] but it's like some of us need the crazy wall some of us need the map with the dotted line and like
[00:19:43] a circle like here's where people saw the flame like thank you yes so this was one of the better
[00:19:50] um in addition to once the director sort of comes in and becomes not a character in the story but
[00:19:58] starts um being our uh virtual i guess in terms of the processing parts of the investigation in
[00:20:05] the present day that and the use of the map really gave me a sense of the layout of the ride and like
[00:20:14] you know i was i was a child many many decades ago when god was also a child like i've been on rides
[00:20:22] like this um and it gave a it was very evocative as to that sort of um that hitchy sensation of that
[00:20:31] kind of ride how dark it is how it kind of smells like feet old smoke so like if you smell kerosene
[00:20:41] you would notice that and just the the sense of place that uh was was created was impressive especially
[00:20:49] for someone like me who you know sometimes in documentaries like this it's like like literally where
[00:20:55] are we i'm not in the game space and time in the story and uh that was that was really well done
[00:21:03] and then just the occasional like even not even a full second cut in of these flames just like
[00:21:11] boiling up an entire wall and then back to someone's account uh gave a real like emotional sense
[00:21:19] of the of the terror that they must have experienced but also i did get a good sense of where everything was
[00:21:26] and why the locations were significant so yeah and the reenactments too like i'm not usually a fan
[00:21:34] but these felt uh advise it like most things did in this documentary that it was like we're not
[00:21:41] gonna go too crazy with the like deep focus and people flailing their arms around like we're just
[00:21:48] gonna do the bare minimum to kind of give this some visual terrain which i thought was good
[00:21:53] i just to assure our listeners there's no reenactments of the deaths it's uh it's the the
[00:22:01] carriages banging through it's the it's the fire and so on the carriages coming out on fire
[00:22:06] that's yeah um that's killing killing that was a very good shot really well
[00:22:13] well those were indicative of the carriages that the people who died had been in
[00:22:20] and were in a spectacular piece of victim blaming uh lunar park officials said well if they're just
[00:22:27] stayed in the carriage they would have been alright uh despite the fact that the people who escaped
[00:22:31] all left their carriages and found ways out were assisted by tiny Jacob and also reported our
[00:22:40] witnesses also reported the flaming cars coming out the other end and going absolutely no chance
[00:22:45] that you could have survived in a carriage i think for me the the the thing that i'd forgotten because
[00:22:52] no i mean i was when i was a child which was what you know god wasn't even born then Sarah
[00:22:58] i in the 60s went to lunar park and it was an amazing magical place you know this is before we
[00:23:06] had a television and all our toys were made of wood um it wasn't it wasn't an incredible place i
[00:23:13] remember the banging of those rubber doors and it's any ghost train that anyone's ever been in
[00:23:19] you'll know it but what i've forgotten and i found incredibly visceral both they described it
[00:23:25] they had it in reenactments and they had some news footage of it was the caged area that
[00:23:32] the cars came out into halfway through the ride where you could see the park and the park could see you
[00:23:39] and the terror of the people who came out of the fiery ride nobody knew it was on fire yet came out
[00:23:50] could see escape could see where they could be to be safe and they couldn't get out because
[00:23:58] they were caged and then they banged back into into the ride to me that was so well evoked i mean
[00:24:06] i think deliberately so but we have in the second part of the first part we have a lot of
[00:24:14] eyewitnesses people who are actually on the ride and when i rewatched it i was surprised i'd
[00:24:19] forgotten them and how important their testimony was at Sarah was there anyone that stood out for you
[00:24:26] in any of the talking hints in in the first part uh there is a woman i can't i can't remember her name
[00:24:35] it's a it's a germany glass name and i think her for you to harness maca yes who is um
[00:24:42] absolutely not having any version of the official story that the director has not even finished
[00:24:51] um talking about how they said it was a powerful it's in uta's like that's where she had
[00:24:57] bless because yeah probably uh but the
[00:25:03] there's sort of a wide range of emotions from people who were present and the control
[00:25:11] that uta is clearly keeping her self under in terms of returning to this trauma for herself
[00:25:20] but also a sort of righteous anger at how it was handled i thought was quite effective and um
[00:25:28] there was a you know very low pH to those interviews that was that was very affecting and but
[00:25:35] i mean i thought they were all i thought they were all good and it was impressive the the number
[00:25:41] of them that there were and the wide range of access that that uh she got meldram hanna because
[00:25:49] i mean a lot of these people should you would think would not be wanting to discuss this whether
[00:25:55] because of trauma or because of the implication of investigators but it was very impressive and uh
[00:26:03] uta was particularly memorable to me i'm going to advise yeah i really liked all of the talking
[00:26:11] heads i kind of liked um all of the older talking heads um where the ones who basically
[00:26:18] alerted everybody about the fire um i like i like all i like all of those people but one person that
[00:26:26] i do want to um uh spotlight frank boy tano the luna park employee he was good like he was very
[00:26:36] interesting because you can see him relive in it you can see him like almost not wanting to relive
[00:26:43] it and as the documentarians are doing just the the most fantastic thing of
[00:26:50] handing the the the talking heads evident as she's going through it with them
[00:26:56] i mean that was such an effective um story tool and i'm sure we'll talk about it but he's
[00:27:02] just like oh my god not something else he's like every time she hands him a paper he's like oh god
[00:27:07] like what are you about to reveal to me now and then later on uh it being revealed that he
[00:27:14] he was he went from like a luta park ticket holder or ride attendant to a lawyer yes uh was really i
[00:27:23] i love finding that out and um his thoughts on on some of the stuff they discovered so he was
[00:27:30] i really liked his reactions i like the reactions of a lot of these talking heads they did a really
[00:27:34] good job of presenting these talking heads with the information in the moment and we can we saw a lot
[00:27:39] of people taking in information in the moment and i mean that's for the good the bad and the ugly
[00:27:46] you know i'm saying we got we got all of it when they're when they were presented a new information but
[00:27:52] um i really enjoyed just the overall process of of them using the talking heads
[00:28:02] yeah and we're introduced to a character that we're only going to see archivaly and that's
[00:28:07] martin sharp for important australian artist founder of the yellow house which is literally
[00:28:13] you know just down the road from me it's still there it's a cafe now but it was an important
[00:28:19] movement i had a martin sharp print you know in the eighties that i loved and his work it can't
[00:28:28] be underestimated the sort of visual impact of his work still today graphically on on australian
[00:28:34] artists he comes up because he was obsessed with luna park and became obsessed with the case
[00:28:45] sarah when jason shows caro meldramana the trays of cassette tapes how did your little journalistic
[00:28:57] antenna go off uh my notes say oh so he's australian's Richard belzer because it just like put me in
[00:29:08] mind of how tirelessly like belzer found a guy to co write two books with him about all the things
[00:29:17] the war and report lied about about the jiff case assassination and it just reminded me like here's
[00:29:23] this guy who's sort of known for um another uh genre of art um taking on this case and never
[00:29:34] never letting it drop um and certainly a tray of cassette tapes um gave my uh eighties kid
[00:29:42] heart a a tingle but i also remember thinking like you know belzer makes a lot of good points
[00:29:51] but it's hard to prove negatives so i really wondered like is where is this going like how is this
[00:30:00] going to be structured um in the event that this is a uh a victim like in holman's case sort of a
[00:30:09] survivor kind of seizing on a crack pot theory to sort of um i don't know how to set not rationalize
[00:30:20] it but just to sort of contextualize the strategy for himself which is a perfectly human response but
[00:30:28] i was like if this turns out to be this really you know and then Elvis and a band of aliens came and
[00:30:34] lit that like oh god like this could get sad in an entirely other way that's not credible it
[00:30:43] and is hard to watch in a different way and it didn't go that direction at all i think that
[00:30:49] this the shift into all right let's figure out what's on this case yeah take us into the second
[00:30:55] and third episode now Sarah yeah with the investigation so that's when they start they get
[00:31:01] everything transcribed they start chasing down these accounts they start finding various witnesses
[00:31:08] that um had you know had a testimony that wasn't used at the inquest or that was suppressed
[00:31:16] allegedly by the police and then it turns into this whole new jersey-esque
[00:31:23] corruption thing that i think they did a really good job stepping you through it like for an
[00:31:29] american viewer i wasn't you know granted them from new jersey so some of these corruption stories
[00:31:36] it's like you could take a shortcut i grew up with this i get it but um i thought they did a really
[00:31:41] good job stepping you through it clearly but not too not too slowly like it wasn't too
[00:31:47] didactic a pace um but yeah i think that i think that the um the leading with martin sharp was an
[00:31:58] interesting choice that i remember thinking like i don't depending on what is on those tapes
[00:32:05] i don't i don't know like this is a four and a half hours is a lot of time to spend
[00:32:10] on like sort of bogus not proof proof so i think that they did they paced it well and they
[00:32:21] made it seem reliable like i was convinced i don't know about you guys yeah leading with martin
[00:32:27] martin sharp i guess it's because you know we have no cultural um rack election of him so i was just like
[00:32:35] i was again this was one of those moments where i was taken out of it because i was just like okay
[00:32:39] it's a guy he's he's obsessed like all these recordings like okay like that's that's all it
[00:32:48] was the locked room you know i got effects and files yeah right right right right right and like
[00:32:57] as he said it could have been like you know the crackpot you just you just didn't know at that
[00:33:01] that point for us because i didn't know right like they said he did all these things but i'm like
[00:33:06] i don't know what that means here like the the way caramel jim and her collaborators
[00:33:11] stepped through the evidence and you do think yeah i don't know about this oh
[00:33:16] yeah oh i mean i found myself yeah and then when we got to never never never ran i said
[00:33:22] if i never and ran i can believe it yes but i can believe it yeah no i i thought i thought
[00:33:29] they i thought they did a really good job and like i said
[00:33:33] episode two was it's really where um i thought it hit the ground running for for me um i will say
[00:33:41] for everybody out there like this is one of those documentaries like what i looked down for two
[00:33:47] seconds i'm like oh man i lost it and i had to rewind so many times so it's not a two-screener
[00:33:55] i i it probably took me longer than four and a half hours to get through it because i had to keep
[00:34:00] or winding stop you know stopping or winding whenever i would fall out of it um but i i did think
[00:34:08] that the most successful part was like we said the maps i would i would even you know me i
[00:34:14] would have loved the map to be up a little bit longer you know i'm saying yeah um the explanation
[00:34:20] of the deaths was it just that they got lost within the ride after trying to escape syrup like i don't
[00:34:27] because they weren't the idea yes okay yeah because um the tiny jacket could see them but he
[00:34:32] couldn't he couldn't get to them get to them yeah because i was i was really shocked once once
[00:34:38] like i said some of the um i witnessed it started going through the actual count what happened and how
[00:34:43] they they said they went through and how the the father and the sons were behind them but the boys
[00:34:48] didn't get on until later i was like well i just assumed that they were like right behind each other
[00:34:53] like it was one of those things it was like right behind each other thing but what was known is like
[00:34:57] there's probably so much chaos and panic and not clearly marked exits that led to some of their
[00:35:03] deaths and i and i i find that i find that like truly sad but i i did and i wanted to learn a little
[00:35:12] bit more about the ride operator who like let the the boys go even though at that point they were
[00:35:19] still kind of signaling fire did we we didn't hear from that guy did we get a splice that he was
[00:35:27] a ticket taker and Tony said the the operator on the guy pushed the yeah push the button no he was
[00:35:35] there but i feel like we did after a certain point we didn't hear that much
[00:35:39] from him and there would be reasons for that but yes i mean once you get into the second episode
[00:35:46] in just this um cavalcade of like dozens of people having pertinent information and then one after
[00:35:54] another they're like we were invited down but we weren't called or we weren't even told to come
[00:36:00] to the house like and then you really start smelling at kerosene soaked yes yes and then the second
[00:36:10] it gets into like oh it's a real state thing that i was like oh Jesus he's so so it's so funny
[00:36:17] so we haven't talked about detective inspector Douglas night who yes is probably get into him
[00:36:24] and the man who started the cover up the man who just mere hours after the fire said it was an
[00:36:31] electrical fault and this was this was the part of the documentary that i really love because
[00:36:38] um caro and her team were introducing the official statements to the eyewitnesses
[00:36:43] and the eyewitnesses are like these official students are not lighting up between Douglas
[00:36:49] night and them saying that there were four witnesses who said that they saw sparks an electrical
[00:36:53] like electrical sparks shortly before the fire all the eyewitnesses are sitting there like hmm it wasn't
[00:37:00] me and then the smash cut of just all the witness me like i didn't say i smell sparks i know it wasn't
[00:37:05] sparks and the one lady talking about how it originated in the fire well they all of the all
[00:37:12] the witnesses when shown the map they said where did you see the fire they all put an x near the
[00:37:17] imitation fire area and one lady had even said she saw the fire and she kind of put her hand
[00:37:23] near it and felt the heat and so all of these people all of their statements correlate saying no
[00:37:29] we saw the fire originate in this one spot but the official statements are saying that are
[00:37:34] originated in this other spot that it couldn't have originated from and then they start showing
[00:37:39] pictures of the the southern fuse boxes what uh Douglas night um blamed the fire for
[00:37:46] and they had pictures of the the southern fuse box almost looking completely untouched amongst
[00:37:53] spooky yeah really it was one of the only things standing in the in the flames and when they start
[00:38:00] to get to this cover up it was just so funny because i was like this seems like to me
[00:38:06] during this second episode i was like this seems like something just a group of teenagers
[00:38:11] probably do like once they said that it was like oh the fire was started in the imitation fireplace
[00:38:17] and i was like i can see some near duels doing this and then as it as it unfolds and it's short
[00:38:25] has like is this for real estate and it's like slowly and slowly unfold i was like oh my god this
[00:38:32] it was it was very good but uh i like getting into the detective inspector Douglas night
[00:38:38] and then the unfolding of just the horrendous people who who who to did this cover up
[00:38:47] hey it's Kaylee Cuoco for price line ready to go to your happy place for a happy price
[00:38:51] well why didn't you say so just download the price line app right now and save up 60% on hotels
[00:38:56] so whether it's cousin kevin's kuzu concert in Kansas City go kevin or becky's bachelorette
[00:39:02] vash and bermuda you never have to miss a trip ever again so download the price line app today
[00:39:07] your savings are waiting go to your happy place for a happy price go to your happy price price line
[00:39:17] the regular season is heating up new stars are emerging and that means more opportunity to win
[00:39:21] up to 25 times your cash on prize picks the most exciting way to play daily fantasy sports
[00:39:26] just select two or more players pick more or less on their projection on a wide variety of stats
[00:39:31] and place your entry it's that easy let it fly to turn ten dollars into two hundred and fifty
[00:39:37] dollars with just a few taps easy gameplay quick withdrawals and injury insurance on your picks are
[00:39:42] what make prize picks the number one daily fantasy sports app watch your favorite players and get
[00:39:47] paid doing at this basketball season see your entries make progress during the game or make new
[00:39:51] entries for the second half in the fourth quarter three pointers assists rebounds and everything
[00:39:55] in between are yours for the taking join the prize fixed community of more than seven million
[00:40:00] players who have already signed up right now price picks will match your first deposit of up to
[00:40:04] one hundred dollars just download the price picks app and use code get one hundred that's code get
[00:40:09] one hundred on price picks for first deposit match up to one hundred dollars price picks pick more
[00:40:15] pick less it's that easy for people who don't know where linear park is if you were standing at
[00:40:24] Sydney Opera House the most recognizable building in the world apparently you were standing
[00:40:29] at the front tip of that and you were looking across at the harbor bridge where the
[00:40:36] northern span touches down is where lunar park is it's right underneath where the bridge is so
[00:40:42] primo harbicide real estate that rang true for me the real estate cover up
[00:40:50] Sarah what struck me was you know with some conspiracy theories you go that's all very well but
[00:40:56] like to what end and and is it logical and could this have happened did you find as it as it unfolded
[00:41:03] that it became more realistic in terms of in our opinion analytically the the light conclusion
[00:41:14] that caramel jim hanna and her team come to uh yeah i mean going into it like at the top of the
[00:41:23] episode i sort of felt like that it was gonna be probably more a question of negligence that was
[00:41:29] covered up and i sort of felt like i was going to be um treating with the story that was like
[00:41:35] the action park documentary meets uh the american experience episode about the triangle shirt
[00:41:42] waistfire and that this was going to be um more of a negligence issue in covering that up i had no idea
[00:41:49] that it was going to be this like Aussie's cervical situation that was just like
[00:41:57] that the corruption went all the way up to the to the level all the way to the top
[00:42:03] so i had no idea that we were that we were getting into that but again
[00:42:08] and you know spending my entire life in the new york new jersey trisate area pretty much like
[00:42:13] this was eminently believable that this is how these things get done i would really like i was just
[00:42:21] maddened that they never tracked down the actual uh bikies yeah or um allegedly etc. tasked with
[00:42:31] setting this fire because it's like if all you want is to like clear off this um land and get it
[00:42:40] condemned so you can take it over for your own nefarious um you know turn up with a haircut whatever
[00:42:47] the hell you're doing um maybe wait until everybody went like it was mentioned that that was
[00:42:56] in the garden state well put in the middle of the night when there's that a fucking four-year-old on
[00:43:03] the ride oh my god don't outsource this stuff to people who are going to like children on fire even
[00:43:09] by mistake fuck there i did pick up that the the the the alleged instruction allegedly was to do it
[00:43:18] after the part closed and that made sick because i was thinking you don't just kill children
[00:43:23] like it brings far too much far too much heat as there were uh so once so every time i had a question
[00:43:30] if it doesn't quite make sense again would be a plate that beautifully paced uh release of
[00:43:37] information to us and the release of the information that it was supposed to be after the part
[00:43:43] closed i thought well that makes sense where i a you know where i absephron for example dead dead
[00:43:50] now so i am i loved it if i'm a mep is dead uh allegedly uh you know where i a king pin of some
[00:43:58] or a queen pin of some kind i would say i want children to die why would i am not a cold-hearted
[00:44:04] monster i would say can you please set it on fire after closing uh and then the the the mechanism
[00:44:11] by which that didn't happen it just all it made sense but then maybe maybe the documentaries
[00:44:17] making it make sense marie well i mean allegedly you know a abes is good at this he's not he's not
[00:44:24] new to this he's true to this he's he's allegedly burned down at least six other buildings
[00:44:30] when they were talking about those other six other buildings they didn't say anything about
[00:44:33] anybody died so i took it as those were professionally done after hours low stakes low you know
[00:44:43] and i i think the problem here was outsourcing to a bunch of 18 to 20 year olds
[00:44:49] bikies apparently that made nobody could really clock their ages but like like sdb said like
[00:44:55] with such vivid descriptions of those perpetrators you should have easily been able to track them
[00:45:03] down i mean they were if you were looking for them if you were exactly if you were looking for
[00:45:07] one of them had like a shorter life blonde hair the star tattoo on his earlobe i was like oh my
[00:45:14] god such a distinguished feature yeah but you know it was called off the the equivalent of the
[00:45:19] APB was called off because they didn't want them found because they could have pointed the finger back
[00:45:26] to main culprit yeah so it was a journey that that second episode was was the journey um that starts
[00:45:35] the third episode for me which was my boy yeah i mean taking off the allegedly the fact is that
[00:45:42] the police were clearing the site the next morning oh yeah that was a gut punch that's another thing
[00:45:48] like i just the way that that timeline was laid out and just how long it took i.e half a
[00:45:58] half a day yeah half a day yeah half a day the next day everything's gone but the tracks
[00:46:05] like the uh one of the parents comes down to leave a flower and everything's been
[00:46:11] leveled and i realized it's not on the same scale but like
[00:46:16] nine eleven it took them like two years to clear off because they weren't trying to hide
[00:46:23] anything like they took their time as a result many investigators on that pile are now ill and uh
[00:46:30] you know i wish them the best treatment but that's i mean this is the cost of really investigating
[00:46:39] something like this and it is i can't believe it wasn't necessarily more shocking at the time to
[00:46:46] people that it was like you know someone's out there with like a broom and a dust bin once the
[00:46:51] sun comes up and like all this like keeps of debris uh also ghost are called evidence
[00:47:01] the forensics the original part they talked to is like yes what the yeah they they talked to
[00:47:08] like at least two firefighters i believe and and i don't i didn't understand why the
[00:47:13] why the firefighters and fire marshal fire chief wasn't taking point on this and why it was
[00:47:18] the police department which we learn later i feel like we didn't understand that either
[00:47:24] you know i think uh you know like Douglas night showed up like and i said you kind of said
[00:47:31] it was like okay they put it they put Douglas night in charge he rolled up and he he started making
[00:47:36] the decision i mean one of the enduring images for me of the documentary is Douglas night on the
[00:47:43] television uh news it at the site the next morning saying yes we've determined it was an electrical
[00:47:50] fire in his eyes dropped down and away and i thought yeah you could he's thrilled he's like you
[00:47:54] cannot even look down the barrel of the camera with that lie the other thing that that turned me
[00:48:01] if it's true was the the girls saying they were going to go to the park because they wanted to meet the
[00:48:08] boys and the father getting the word uh don't let them go so that's so that's how i was so three
[00:48:17] opens right we we talked to um one of the mothers of one of the boys um and she said she had just
[00:48:24] noticed a bunch of girls like really crying at the back of funeral and then later one of the
[00:48:29] girls called her up and said we were supposed to meet within that night but you know my father wouldn't
[00:48:34] let us go and the mother was like i always found that quite odd and then they're like who's his father
[00:48:40] is like what is his name John Rooklyn or something um what's his name names saffron yeah Rooklyn yeah
[00:48:48] the some his name was something Rooklyn but he was a known like gangster liaison like he had ties to
[00:48:56] mafia people here in america and he basically tells them don't go that night because something
[00:49:03] is gonna go down and the way that they open episode three like that and then just the red strings of it
[00:49:11] all was just truly amazing because we find out Rooklyn is the one who puts Douglas night in charge
[00:49:18] and then um on top of Douglas night i forget the the second guy but the biggest thing was the third
[00:49:25] guy when they showed the third guy's pictures to all the police officers and they're like oh good
[00:49:31] not not him then we just get also their reaction like a couple of them just sort of like holding the
[00:49:39] is like a joggy bag of poo that they're just like oh this is this asshole and it's revealed to be bill
[00:49:46] allen apparently who was known as the world's crookedest cop who we can see news footage later um he
[00:49:55] like get he later gets charged in all sorts of just bribery uh all this stuff just he's outed for
[00:50:03] like a good portion of his crimes and it was just it was just like very amazing turnfold if you love
[00:50:11] that red string this is where this is where i mean they used to they used to say new south whales
[00:50:18] police the best police force money can buy uh it's not so anymore but you know certainly it's
[00:50:26] none of its uh rang falsely to me so anything else before we give our ratings and final thoughts
[00:50:34] i think that this was particularly um respectful of victims and their differing experiences
[00:50:42] of a single tragedy in a way that is less unusual than it has been like five years ago or 10 years ago
[00:50:52] which is a good thing but still striking i mean yeah you know we all consume a lot of these
[00:50:59] documentaries and there were ways in which this was this had an in ear for
[00:51:07] um the emotion of its own story that i found impressive and yeah admirable as well
[00:51:16] i would also like to say that this was a stunning use of talking heads like sdb said it gave
[00:51:23] them room to grieve it gave them room to recount the events in their own way and to present
[00:51:30] their own stories um and there was a lot of them there was like there's truly a lot of meat
[00:51:37] actually at the end of the docu's here do we get like the board full of everybody that we talk to
[00:51:42] and they did a remarkable job of letting these people lay out the story while also giving us
[00:51:49] reenactments that made sense archival footage that gave context and um just i love the way that we got
[00:51:59] to see caro and her team connect with the talking heads i'm thinking about less doubt who they who
[00:52:04] they found it felt like they were finding people i i want to know who the researcher was because it
[00:52:10] felt like they're finding people just up and down city i don't know the cost of Sydney but i
[00:52:15] feel like they were all up and down it um so um i think it was i do think it was wonderfully done
[00:52:21] for it to be mostly um people's first hand accounts of what they remember and they did
[00:52:29] a perfect job of weaving all of those different stories together and again like i like of course i
[00:52:34] said um showing them showing the the witnesses and people like stuff that they had maybe not seen
[00:52:41] before and getting their their authentic reactions on camera was was a really really good touch
[00:52:50] i think it's interesting you know time time has passed it's over 40 years and i think you know
[00:52:58] it's very very fresh for a lot of people still but also other people who might have tales to tell
[00:53:05] or a piece of information they've been chewing on for 40 years it may be a relief to talk to
[00:53:12] a journalist to write something down to make a deathbed confession you know we see this in
[00:53:19] uh often you know late white why did they speak now after all these years but in fact it is
[00:53:25] after all these years is the time that you speak because you've been living with it for all that time
[00:53:31] so Sarah how many magnifying glasses are you going to rate exposed the ghost train fire out of a
[00:53:37] possible five uh i think in the as at the end of the first episode i would have been at a three and
[00:53:46] a half or a four and then as of the middle or the end of the second episode it was up to a four and a
[00:53:52] half but i'm going to give it the full five because it has a cumulative power uh it has a
[00:53:59] respect for its victims it's affecting but it's not um it's not like cynical about the way that
[00:54:08] it's trying to affect you it's just telling everyone's stories and letting them tell their stories
[00:54:15] in a way that is very moving but also rigorous as far as i could see
[00:54:22] it wasn't a story i was familiar with i wasn't tempted to google it uh i really
[00:54:28] you know do i have a couple of little nitpicks maybe but it's more that it's like i just want to find out
[00:54:34] what actually happened that's not on meldramhanna that's on the corrupt power structures of 70s and
[00:54:42] 80s uh new south whales so fire i'm doing it wow you're doing it
[00:54:48] marie what about you how many magnifying glasses i would give them a four point five just because
[00:54:53] i do have to knock off the point five for the first episode because honestly if we weren't covering it
[00:55:00] and i just put this on just to put it on i truly don't know if i would have gotten to the great
[00:55:05] bits i i truly don't because i agree with sdb it really compounded on itself and it made sense by the
[00:55:13] and it did a very good job from tip to tail but the tip doesn't really draw you in as much as the tail does
[00:55:21] so um you know for some people who again like us true crime hits who are just like oh let me turn
[00:55:29] on something in the background or let me just you know pop this on this looks entertaining i don't
[00:55:34] know if they would have stuck around so just for that i'm gonna give it a four point five but all
[00:55:39] together is something i'm really glad i stuck with and i watched because i was so intrigued by the
[00:55:45] end of it and i and i and i don't care i know we're supposed to be subjected but i was like i'm
[00:55:49] they saw me to meet you just like it all made sense they saw it and so i like that kind of outcome as
[00:55:57] well like you know that it feels like we do have answers to the question even though they might
[00:56:03] be they might not be official answers i do feel like a lot of the holes were plugged up and they did a
[00:56:09] great job of doing that how about you Sarah look i'm a five i love that first episode almost
[00:56:17] in and of itself even if there wasn't to be further further exploration investigation can of worms
[00:56:26] as openings is just for the very human stories that it told the as Sarah says stately pace it actually
[00:56:36] kind of needed to be and then right in the last minute of that episode it's like mmm arson
[00:56:42] question mark and then that draws you into the world of the second and third episode so i'm going to
[00:56:49] give it a five there was criticism of the program's allegations at the time that it came out
[00:56:56] and the ABC board established inquiry into the program so two weeks ago we reviewed part one of
[00:57:03] a three part docu series murder in Boston with georothy we all gave that five magnifying glasses
[00:57:10] based only on that first episode now we've all watched all the episodes as Sarah what were your
[00:57:16] overall thoughts on that property murder in Boston this is a case that i was familiar with
[00:57:23] i'm sure this is not true at least like even in Boston i'm sure this is not true but my sort of
[00:57:31] like naive at that time mind kind of feels that chucks duert uh was the vanguard for like
[00:57:39] a better term of blaming a black guy and this was really about not just that but about Boston's whole
[00:57:49] problem i think in that regard it's the same guy who did the michael jordan yeah series so there's some
[00:57:59] like build um construction ticks that are put to good use here i think like pretty good use uh
[00:58:07] i felt like this by making it much more about the context of place and time um made made the story sort
[00:58:18] of like greater than the sum of its parts um it was really not easy to watch it was gross the whole
[00:58:27] steward family seems to um have a lot of problems or had a lot of problems but uh although
[00:58:36] i think that it was a victim of like everything has to be a three-parter now for some reason
[00:58:43] i'm not sure that's necessarily true i think this could have been a two-hour feature but it was
[00:58:49] um very compelling and i think it set up from the correct angle so for me it would be like
[00:58:57] four and a four and a half four and a half and mariti stand by your initial ratings of five or did
[00:59:04] the second and third episode uh change your mind no i i i definitely stand by my initial reading
[00:59:11] of five i think the second episode um did a good job we do we talked about how the first episode
[00:59:17] set up the powder keg that was Boston the racial powder keg that that was Boston and then the second
[00:59:23] episode kind of just ignites it and you know we we find out about like how the binnets are treated
[00:59:30] willy binnets uh family um who was who was a black man who was suspected of the murders and um
[00:59:38] you know until you get to and then lug in the poor police practices that basically let them harass
[00:59:45] a whole black community based on just the words of of one guy like not police work just through the
[00:59:52] words of one guy to episode three again full spoilers here um starting with Chuck's death and
[00:59:59] suicide i was i thought that was pretty interesting but i didn't realize they started with that
[01:00:04] because guess what that's when the investigation started oh yeah and that's when the you know uh
[01:00:10] we get his brother's confession that leads Chuck to um his completion of suicide that leads
[01:00:16] the police to actually doing their job and uncovering you know all of the things that they would have
[01:00:22] uncovered if they had actually did some investigating uh you know the four months previous um how all
[01:00:30] all of the things tied back to Chuck being the perpetrator behind this crime and that if you know
[01:00:36] they hadn't let silly old racism get in the way they could have figured that out much sooner
[01:00:43] and um just the infuri the infuriation that uh that police officer was it bill done
[01:00:49] bill done in vote in in me he would do nothing differently marie yeah yeah we still know
[01:00:56] he said we still know who killed yeah all the evidence I've missed my old city
[01:01:03] yeah it's not it's not bus to say what they did know say it without saying it bill so i mean
[01:01:13] I truly truly love that docu series because like sdb said i knew this case i knew this case
[01:01:19] backward in four uh but i knew it as the up you murders like i said in our in our review
[01:01:24] i knew it from the angle of oh it's about money life insurance like they they these other properties
[01:01:30] they never talk about the racial aspect it's almost like they too want to just gloss over
[01:01:36] the fact that he was able to get away with it for so long because he understood the racial
[01:01:42] undertones and the racial tensions of his of his city and he was able to use that to
[01:01:49] almost commit the perfect crime because if his brother hadn't come forward will he been it would
[01:01:53] have been sitting in prison for her murder so it's you know it's it's a trotious and i think
[01:01:59] that it highlighted the the right things about the case it completely highlighted the right things
[01:02:03] about about the case and yeah they could probably have um cut that third episode up a little bit more
[01:02:10] you know and then you know just made it a just like a two-parter but honestly i i loved everything
[01:02:16] in it like i said i think um it definitely spoke to the times and that that's what i really appreciate
[01:02:25] how about you Sarah do you stand by your reading yeah i'm gonna keep it as a five i thought it was
[01:02:30] absolutely fascinating and given the historical background given the context i loved
[01:02:38] hit well loved i mean but you know i i found it satisfying to hear all of that
[01:02:45] the documentary gave me time to think and it also said well once they said will he been it hadn't
[01:02:50] done that i'll be done this other thing so we'll keep him in jail and i thought
[01:02:56] sing from that song sheet because i think that happens as well we will arrest you because you
[01:03:01] must have done something and now that we have you in custody we will find that something and we will
[01:03:07] leave you in uh in jail for that thing because we didn't like the look of you and i thought that
[01:03:13] it's very very fun but think of all the people who also end up in you know for probably other crimes
[01:03:19] because they initiated that stop in frisk and they were essentially given the green light to just
[01:03:24] harass that community all of the all of the life-changing things that they did in that four month time
[01:03:30] time spent and it just really you know actually i'm sorry i mean i'm not pleased it's it's a hot
[01:03:37] topic and i can i suppose what also struck me is how it's not a thing of the past
[01:03:44] it's it's a now thing and they did that by just by showing you you go yes that's still happening
[01:03:50] now but also the very powerful testimony of the younger generation of black people who
[01:03:58] who wear it today and i'm living it today so yes let's move to our recommendations uh Sarah what do
[01:04:06] you have to recommend for alasnus well uh i have a couple very quickly um there is a version of this story
[01:04:16] that was made in 1990 uh starring ken 30 something old and all people as chucks doored um they named it
[01:04:25] something absolutely terrible like a tilt death to us part or something like that but you can find
[01:04:32] it on youtube pretty easily just google chucks doored youtube and it'll be there it's actually
[01:04:40] pretty well done there's a lot of hay attack guys in it and ken olin is just such a malignant
[01:04:47] narcissist presence which is a little surprising you're sort of used to thinking of him as you know
[01:04:53] 30 somethings uh warm and well meaning yuppie but uh not he's not that in this so i would recommend
[01:05:01] that and i also recently watched on the Turner classic movies app my new favorite app because
[01:05:08] i'm a young and hip this 1971 movie called the Todd killings which is based on a real story about a
[01:05:17] guy named charles schmid who was this like piper of Tucson like that's actually literally what they
[01:05:25] called him he was like the old guy at the club he um but he surrounded himself with these teenagers even
[01:05:31] though he was much older and uh there were murders connected with this guy and they made a movie
[01:05:38] starring almost known you've heard of but it's also full of hay it's that guys from like 70s
[01:05:44] cobshows you'll be like um and it's really quite amazingly well done like a lot of the culture
[01:05:54] has dug in on this story in different ways like uh joys carolotes uh where are you going
[01:06:00] where have you been apparently that short story is based on this case and then the movie
[01:06:06] starring more adorned from the 80s which is based on the story bob dillon roto song about it
[01:06:12] rose mcgowen made a short about it uh but the Todd killings from 1971 if you can find it
[01:06:21] i definitely recommend it it's a little like weird and occasionally trying too hard but for 1971
[01:06:29] where you would really expect sort of an establishment uh film to be trying to make a comment on
[01:06:36] capital k kids today it's rather restrained it's in and out in 91 minutes which god bless let's go
[01:06:43] back to that uh let's go back to that please please yeah i mean it uh it's left the it's left the
[01:06:51] tcm roster for right now but it may be back and i think you may be able to find it on the criterion
[01:06:57] channel it's really an interesting look at you know like a what 50 years ago they were like how
[01:07:05] this kind of case this story was told and they did quite a good job the lead actor is serving this
[01:07:13] weird mix of fander beak and jack Nicholson that's a little disconcerting but you get used to it
[01:07:18] in then in 91 minutes it's over it's called the Todd killings if i didn't mention that already
[01:07:23] yes yes i'll put all of this in the show notes of course so i was honoured,
[01:07:32] flattered, blushing pink to my cheeks uh to be asked to contribute to best evidences here and round
[01:07:40] up of the best into crime books long reads podcasts and documentaries best evidence is serody
[01:07:46] bunting and previous guest if baby's news letter anyway you get it every sub stack you get it
[01:07:54] every day of the week uh every weekday and it is fascinating and that is my big recommendation
[01:08:02] is subscribe to that because it's it's wonderful yeah so yeah so i'm just i know that americans say
[01:08:12] sucking kneecaps here in australia we call it pissing in your pocket but Sarah i'm not pissing in your
[01:08:17] pocket it was fascinating for me to look back at my true crime consumption for the year which has
[01:08:24] been a lot so marion i not only watch everything that we talked to you about we watch a whole lot
[01:08:30] of other stuff which we decide not to do or we don't have time to do or is not good
[01:08:35] so the list uh dropping daily on best evidence um really fascinated to see what my fellow
[01:08:43] crime writers podcasters and commentators are recommending so my recommendation of podcast
[01:08:49] was you at was and is you didn't see nothing from your handsla kore and invisible institute i
[01:08:56] arrived about it on crime scene at the time it came out and i'd like to highlight two other
[01:09:02] recommendations from our colleagues the retrievals about the Yale fertility center nurse
[01:09:09] stopping out fentanyl used in the agricultural process with saline and the dismissal of the women
[01:09:15] who reported excruciating pain we've recommended that here before but it's worth recommending again
[01:09:22] and one that i missed out on uh so i'm going to definitely circle back too is violation which is
[01:09:29] about the way parole is used to abuse prisoners who have already paid for their crimes so i'm
[01:09:35] just highlighting those two but recommending uh best evidence in general and the year end roundup
[01:09:41] in particular to give you things for your holiday break at crime scene we are eager to hear your
[01:09:48] feedback and suggestions for future episodes you can follow crime scene on twitter at crime scene
[01:09:53] r-h-o-p that's s-e-e-n or email us crime scene r-h-o-p at gmail.com
[01:10:01] we're on tiktok at crime.scene and on all other social media as crime scene podcast
[01:10:09] and please remember to subscribe to our feed by going to rob has a website dot com slash crime
[01:10:15] feed it makes a huge difference.
[01:10:21] Sarah what do you have going on and wick and the people find you?
[01:10:25] well i do have best evidence as you mentioned and thank you for contributing to that
[01:10:30] it's one of my favorite things that we do each year and that's at bestevidence.fi and best
[01:10:36] evidence fyi on various socials including instagram and blue sky and i have a true crime bookshop
[01:10:45] that's all i sell there how true crime is told and sold mostly secondhand some new items which you
[01:10:51] should check out because they're on sale right now for everyone but especially for you listeners
[01:10:58] if you use the code x c s 15 that's x c s one five at checkout at exhibit bebooks.com you will get
[01:11:08] 15% off your order we'll link to that in the show notes i hope but oh yes then come on through
[01:11:15] save some money. raid some crime and what do you have going on and wick and the people find you
[01:11:22] Mary? well we just wrapped up our coverage of rap shit over on post show recaps me and shepel finish
[01:11:30] our coverage of season two we had an amazing journey so if you haven't already go check out
[01:11:36] rap shit on hbo max you know max app and then you can go listen to us talk breakdown each episode
[01:11:45] in season two and it was just an astonishing season and we were floored at the finale and we're so
[01:11:53] sad that it's done and we need more people to go and watch it in stream it so we can guarantee
[01:11:57] that season three but you can go to post show recaps.com slash connect in order to hear our
[01:12:05] our rap shit coverage we're also doing the best of 2023 for post show recaps we did a look back
[01:12:13] on everything that's the connect covered this year we had a pretty busy year so i'm pretty sure
[01:12:19] you can get that by going going to post show recaps.com slash 2023 and to hear us break down
[01:12:25] everything that we've covered over this year we did like five things we covered swarms snowfall
[01:12:32] the other black girl the changeling and rap shit so definitely go check that out. Sarah what about
[01:12:39] you what do you got going on? well people can follow me if they'd like to do that it's Sarah
[01:12:43] caradine on all the things over on post show recaps i've just finished covering the art for dodger
[01:12:49] worth a listen we said and i am very amusing if i say so myself. Agrees Jess and i will bring you a
[01:12:58] full spoiler recap of a murder at the end of the world on silent podcast i've just finished
[01:13:05] coverage of squid game the challenge and my co-host mccleave and i will be interviewing some of the
[01:13:10] contestants starting with Felicia and Ashley cannot wait to talk to those two ladies.
[01:13:17] watch for my traders UK coverage and we'll be starting next week with a pre-season breakdown
[01:13:22] with the winner of traders news elin season one not saying their name no spoilers.
[01:13:29] Next time on crime scene we're covering love has won the cult of mother god with mat scott
[01:13:35] watch it on max in the us and binge in australia and send us your comments and questions.
[01:13:42] thanks to Sarah debunting for joining us will from america for the theme music and the whole rhap team
[01:13:49] behind the scenes until next time case closed.
[01:14:11] you
